It better not break laws of physics -- that wouldn't be sensible. It may rely on non-reductionist causality. Rather than the material cause of subatomic particles causing higher level phenomena, the forms and structures of the noetic are the cause. Like, the structure of a rational argument becomes the functional cause of human actions in a more meaningful sense than the propagation of atomic forces.
If accessing the Noetic Realm is just a causal process that happens to constitute a normatively correct process of logic or maths, then a pocket calculator accesses the Noetic Realm, and there is no problem in an advanced AI doing so.
The idea is to try to explain the emergence of accurate and effective conceptual thinking. The calculate is a good example to try to explain -- it’d need to explain why it’s not actually thinking with concepts but rather processing information in another way.
I know it’s out on a limb to try to draw Plato into this, but conceptually competent AI is so surprising that I believe it is worthy of diverse hypothetical explanations. Thanks for engaging.
if an AI can do.accurate and effective conceptual thinking, it has a mechanical explanation, and there is still no obvious need for a Platonic explanation in addition.The
Conceptual competent AI isn't surprising, it's overdue.
If a human accesses the Noetic Realm, does that look like an exception to the laws of physics?I
If an AI accesses the Noetic Realm, does that look a departure from its programming?
It better not break laws of physics -- that wouldn't be sensible. It may rely on non-reductionist causality. Rather than the material cause of subatomic particles causing higher level phenomena, the forms and structures of the noetic are the cause. Like, the structure of a rational argument becomes the functional cause of human actions in a more meaningful sense than the propagation of atomic forces.
If accessing the Noetic Realm is just a causal process that happens to constitute a normatively correct process of logic or maths, then a pocket calculator accesses the Noetic Realm, and there is no problem in an advanced AI doing so.
The idea is to try to explain the emergence of accurate and effective conceptual thinking. The calculate is a good example to try to explain -- it’d need to explain why it’s not actually thinking with concepts but rather processing information in another way.
I know it’s out on a limb to try to draw Plato into this, but conceptually competent AI is so surprising that I believe it is worthy of diverse hypothetical explanations. Thanks for engaging.
if an AI can do.accurate and effective conceptual thinking, it has a mechanical explanation, and there is still no obvious need for a Platonic explanation in addition.The
Conceptual competent AI isn't surprising, it's overdue.